- Long after Sunday night’s race was
over, NASCAR’s vice president of competition, Robin Pemberton, provided a
thorough, clear explanation of why caution lights inexplicably came on with two
of 500 laps remaining. Unfortunately, Pemberton’s explanation wasn’t the only
one offered by NASCAR after the race. Even if the original explanation – a mechanical
malfunction – was honestly thought to be the correct one at the time, NASCAR
should nev er
issue statements or explanations until it is certain it has the right one. The
best of intentions can easily be overshadowed by a mistaken perception of a
cover-up, or even worse, incompetence.
- If there is one sport whose fans should always be
wary to assume a particular outcome, it’s NASCAR. How many of the sport’s most famous
race finishes came about because something unexpected happened on the final lap
of a very long race? Dozens. It is silly to suggest ‘the right driver’ won
Sunday night’s race simply because it was the same driver leading before the
caution miscue. We know who won because of a mistaken caution and subsequent
downpour. We have no idea who would have won had the race remained under green.
- On the surface, both Jimmie Johnson (19th)
and Joey Logano (20th) had average finishes in Sunday night’s race.
It would have been interesting to see how the outcome may have changed if both
had not suffered issues during the race – Johnson with a shredded tire and Logan o with broken power
steering. Both were very fast early in the race.