During Tuesday night's edition of
NASCAR Race Hub on Speed, Elliott
Sadler, driver of the No. 2 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet, re-capped
his incident with five-time NASCAR Sprint Cup Series champion, Jimmie
Johnson. He spoke with host Danielle Trotta
about what happened.
“I just kind of got into the back of
Jimmie, it was 100-percent my fault,” said Sadler, describing the incident that
started as the field had just entered the race’s second lap. “It got other cars
involved like you see in a lot of the restrictor plate races. We were coming
into the outside lane, through the tri-oval, the 78 (Regan Smith) and the 48
(Jimmie Johnson) kind of get bunched up a little bit. They came down and its
100-percent my fault in getting into the back of Jimmie.
“We were kind of bogged down, everyone
was side-by-side and I didn’t check up in time, and I got into the left-rear
quarter (panel) of Jimmie. It was just a little bit, but that is usually all it
takes at these types of speeds. It’s a bad way to get
started.”
Sadler also talked about the phone call
he made to Johnson Tuesday morning.
“You
never want to be involved in a situation like this. Being good friends with
Jimmie, and his crew, (as they) actually pitted my truck last year in Bristol
(Tenn.). I saw his guys last night at the airport, and I apologized to all of
them. I called Jimmie the first thing this morning just to say to him, ‘Look.
And explained to him what happened. I was sorry. I had no excuses. It was 100
percent my fault.’ I just probably really shouldn’t have been racing that hard,
that soon. I snuck up on him a lot quicker than I thought," Sadler said.
"Jimmie handled it like he handles
everything else. He’s just a class act and a good guy. I also called Chad Knaus
also. We reached out to those guys as well. It was just a tough way to get the
racing season started.”
Veteran sports writer Jim Utter covers NASCAR for The Charlotte Observer and its racing site, ThatsRacin.com. In this space, Jim writes about all things NASCAR and other forms of racing which may also be relevant ... or not.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Three days' worth of the Daytona 500
Observations
NASCAR and its tracks have all kinds of contingency plans for various emergencies. But sometimes you just have to learn from experience. It seems save to say that all the work that went into dealing with the crumbling of asphalt and the pothole that emerged during the 2010 Daytona 500 played a role in NASCAR and Daytona International Speedway's ability to deal with the jet dryer explosion and resulting fuel spill on the track this year. So in a sense, while the 2010 race may have been a black-eye, what was learned from it helped allow the 2012 version of the race from becoming a bigger one.
It was somewhat surprising to see how little a factor Tony Stewart and Carl Edwards were in this year's 500. The two drivers who battled down to the wire for the 2011 Sprint Cup title had shown to have fast cars at Speedweeks. Edwards won the pole for the 500 while Stewart won his Gatorade 150-mile qualifying race. Both eventually got involved in late-race accidents in the 500 but were rarely up front.
I don't know if Danica Patrick is going to be a great NASCAR driver. At this point, neither does anyone else. What she deserves is the opportunity to find out – and without unrealistic expectations lofted on her from the get-go. What she also doesn't need are TV announcers who constantly try to bolster her "case" by making outrageous claims. Examples: Claiming Patrick, who had yet turned a lap in the a Cup race, is now the "face" of NASCAR. Another: Suggesting that same driver was one that could teach others like five-time series champion Jimmie Johnson. Johnson has done quite well on his own before Patrick's arrival. That kind of talk enrages far more NASCAR fans than it engages.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)